Daphne Keller

Daphne Keller

Daphne Keller

  • Director of Program on Platform Regulation, Cyber Policy Center
  • Lecturer, Stanford Law School

Biography

Popular press writing focuses on platform regulation and Internet users' rights in the U.S., EU, and around the world. Her recent work has focused on platform transparency, data collection for artificial intelligence, interoperability models, and “must-carry” obligations. She has testified before legislatures, courts, and regulatory bodies around the world on topics ranging from the practical realities of content moderation to copyright and data protection. She was previously Associate General Counsel for Google, where she had responsibility for the company’s web search products. She is a graduate of Yale Law School, Brown University, and Head Start.

SHORT PIECES

 

ACADEMIC PUBLICATIONS

 

POLICY PUBLICATIONS

 

FILINGS

  • U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief on behalf of Francis Fukuyama, NetChoice v. Moody (2024)
  • U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief with ACLU, Gonzalez v. Google (2023)
  • Comment to European Commission on data access under EU Digital Services Act
  • U.S. Senate testimony on platform transparency

 

PUBLICATIONS LIST

publications

Policy Briefs
December 2023

Amicus "Friend of the Court" Brief in NetChoice Supreme Court Case

Author(s)
Amicus "Friend of the Court" Brief in NetChoice Supreme Court Case
Policy Briefs
January 2023

Brief of American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, And Daphne Keller as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondant

Author(s)
Brief of American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, And Daphne Keller as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondant

In The News

Encina Hall Entrance
Q&As

Stanford’s Daphne Keller on SCOTUS Decision that Google, Twitter, and Facebook not Responsible for Islamic State Deadly Posts

Q&A with Daphne Keller. Published by the Stanford Law School
Stanford’s Daphne Keller on SCOTUS Decision that Google, Twitter, and Facebook not Responsible for Islamic State Deadly Posts
Encina Hall Entrance
Q&As

Q&A: Section 230 is at the Supreme Court. Here’s Why that Matters for Free Expression

Four legal experts, including PPR's Daphne Keller weigh in on two cases at the United States Supreme Court that could alter how the internet functions, how it is governed, and how users engage with it. Published in Freedom House.
Q&A: Section 230 is at the Supreme Court. Here’s Why that Matters for Free Expression